|
PFI Newsletter: December 2002
The
Four Ws of Incentive Planning...Who, Why, When and What
There are many important
factors to consider when developing an incentive program. There are,
however, core considerations that, like the four Ps of marketing
(product, price, place and promotion), must be properly planned in
order to insure a successful incentive program. They are the who
(participants), why (goals), when (timing) and what (program
structure).
These four incentive
program development factors form the incentive engine that when fueled
by the right rewards will put you on the road to success.
Who…Deciding
"who" should participate in an incentive program is one of the first
important steps. In a sales incentive program, be sure to consider the
entire
channel. The best
participant is one who, when motivated, can most directly impact the
program goals. This may not be your client’s sales force. Good
questions to ask your client are "where are things not happening in
your distribution channel?" "Where is the bottleneck?" Chances are the
answer will point to "who" should be participating.
Other factors that
determine "Who" should participate include:
-
Accessibility – Is the
information available to contact participants directly or do you
have to contact participants indirectly through other channel
partners or direct mail? Indirect contact may require several months
and cost additional funds that might be better spent focusing on
participants further up the marketing channel.
-
Budget – The amount of
money budgeted for an incentive program may ultimately decide who
participates. For example, you have determined your client has a
budget of $100,000 dollars. Your client also says that the
participants who can most directly have an impact on their goals is
the store manager. There are, however, 1,000 store managers.
This means your per participant budget is only $100. To include
store managers, you would need to look at developing rules using a
contest structure or sweepstakes versus a true incentive. The other
option would be to move up the channel and target your dollars at a
smaller participant group where you can get a greater bang for your
incentive buck.
-
Company policy – Many
companies have policies that prevent employees from participating or
limit their involvement. You need to find out early in the process
if there are any limitations to participation or the types of awards
that can be offered to your target audience.
Why...The
foundation of success for any incentive program is set when you
establish the right goals. Goals that are realistic, measurable and
attainable serve as the cornerstones for achieving the results your
client desires.
Realistic – Unrealistic
goals only yield the realism of failure. An example of an unrealistic
goal is a sales manager setting a goal of a 10% increase over the
previous year when the company has never achieved more than a 3-5%
increase and the market is declining.
Measurable – Goals must
be measurable. Participants must be provided clear and understandable
objectives. For example, increase sales is not a goal. Increase sales
10% is a goal.
Attainable – Goals may be
realistic, but not attainable. A sales manager may set an
across-the-board goal for the company of a 10% increase over the
previous year. That then becomes everyone’s goals. However, that goal
may be realistic for the company, but for many individual
participants, it is unattainable.
Another important
consideration in identifying goals is to keep the number of goals to a
minimum. It’s like the old cooking axiom, too many cooks spoil the
broth only in this case it is too many goals spoil the program. The
incentive program should focus attention and effort on the top two or
at most three sales/revenue objectives of your client. If you’re
looking at more than three goals, you will water down the motivational
impact of all goals and thereby reduce the program’s success
potential.
Finally, an important but
often overlooked factor in identifying goals is to get sales
management and senior management buy-in. Launching a program targeted
to achieve goals that the sales manager(s) don’t agree to is a sure
recipe for failure.
When…When
to run a program more often than not depends on the goals of the
program. Incentive programs implemented to drive annual performance
will typically kickoff at the beginning of a calendar or fiscal year.
Other goals that drive the decision of "when" to implement an
incentive include the following:
-
Invigorate sales during
peak period in sales cycle
-
Invigorate sales during
a sales slump
-
Reinforce the launch of
a new product
or product line
-
Reinforce a consumer or
customer advertising/promotion effort
-
Defend against
competition
Factors that may conflict
with an incentive program should also be considered when looking at
the timing of the program. Find out what other marketing, sales
promotion and advertising efforts are planned for the time period that
the incentive program will be running. If there are other major
company efforts, they may compete for your participants’ time and
attention and have an adverse effect on the incentive program. It may
be worth delaying a launch to insure the incentive program receives
the maximum amount of attention.
What…
Of course, one of the most important steps in building a
successful incentive program is developing a rules structure that
targets the goals of the program, can be clearly presented and
understood by your target audience, and most important, establishes
the framework that when combined with the right awards will create a
program structure that will appeal to and motivate program
participants.
How you actually
structure a program more often than not is dictated by the budget.
Basically there are two ways to structure and fund an incentive
program—open-end budget programs and closed-end budget programs.
Open-end programs
include continuity or point-based programs, plateau/step-up programs,
goal-based programs or some combination of all three. An open-end
program literally means there is no cap or limit to the earning
potential of participants. Open-end programs must be structured so
that funding is based on incremental sales or purchase performance. It
is the purest and most effective incentive application. For
participants it means "sell more earn more" or if it is
goal-achievement based it is "hit and win."
Closed-end programs
address the challenge of a "fixed budget." This means that regardless
of how many participants achieve goal or how many units and individual
sells, no more than the budgeted amount will be issued in awards.
Contests and sweepstakes
form the basis for most closed-end budgets. Closed-end budget programs
have the inherent downside of leaving many participants who may have
achieved goal, met a personal quota or sold more units than ever
before without an award. They can, however, still be highly promoted,
provide a motivational bang and yield the performance and results your
client demands.
Seven
Basic Award Plans
Once you’ve defined the
budget basis of your program (open-end vs. closed-end). There are
essentially seven core award plan structures to consider:
Per Unit Awards:
This is structure where participants earn points for each item, or
group of items sold. Variations on this include paying out on a per
unit basis "retroactive" to achieving goal or a percentage of a goal.
Per unit award structures are typically used for long-term
accumulation, like in continuity or frequent-purchase programs. This
structure usually has a delayed redemption cycle (as points are earned
and accumulated.) This has the positive benefit of building
motivational momentum for participants and providing a positive cash
flow for your client. Per unit programs, however, tend to have higher
rates of breakage (unredeemed points).
Hit & Win Awards:
This is probably the simplest structure of all. Participants are
assigned a goal. When they achieve their goal they get a payout. The
payout can be points, or specially selected awards. This structure
lends itself to both short term and long term programs. Hit and win is
most frequently used when there are specific sales goals to be
achieved. Hit and win programs are the easiest way to insure that your
client is paying only for results achieved.
Step-Up Awards:
Also known as "plateau awards." Participants are presented a series of
incremental award levels and the criteria they must achieve to qualify
for the awards at each level. This is a structure that is used to get
participants to stretch their performance to higher levels of
achievement. Step-up programs are typically used in short-term
programs where there is a one-time payout. Breakage tends to be much
lower and administration requirements are often minimal.
Award Pools: Award
pools present a group of participants with a fixed award amount that
can be divided equally or based on performance. The award pool
structure is most frequently used when there is a limited budget, when
individual measurement is not possible or when you’re looking to
foster a team or group effort.
Games, Sweepstakes,
etc.:Sweepstakes programs present participants with the chance to
win awards based on entries they earn for achieving defined
performance criteria. Sweepstakes and games are used when there are
limited funds relative to the size of the target audience. Sweepstakes
can create an air of excitement and increase the motivational impact
of a small budget. The downside is that there is a limited connection
between awards and performance and more often than not, there are more
losers than winners.
Contests: A
contest is a closed-end structure that allocates a fixed value of
awards to those participants who meet and exceed defined performance
criteria. With a contest there is always a fixed number of winners.
Incentive contests can create an exciting and motivating environment.
With contests you can present higher value awards. Contests, however,
require more extensive reporting, tracking and ranking. There is also
a significant chance that goal achievers may earn nothing. Contests
also present the challenge of establishing fair criteria, specifically
if you have a wide range of sales/purchase volume among your
participant base. In this scenario, volume based performance favors
those with high sales/purchase numbers. Percentage based contest
criteria favors the smaller volume performers who can more easily
achieve percentage increases.
Competitive Groups:
A competitive groups program is a variation on a contest that allows
you to segment your target audience based on historic sales volume
performance in a way that performance criteria can be equally applied.
Competitive group
structures can also be built around team, geographic or sales
organizational criteria.
Incentive Program Development Rules of Thumb
Simpler is Better
–Remember K.I.S.S.
If you ranked the basic
guidelines for building an incentive program in order of importance,
this rule would be number one! Many programs have failed due to the
shear weight and complexity of their structure. Here are a few easy
tips for keeping things simple:
Limit Your Goals
Limit the number of goals to two or three primary objectives; more
than this and you will lose your target audience.
Link Payout To
Performance
You will maximize the motivational impact of the program the
closer you link the award payout to the performance required. The
greater the gap the more you reduce the motivational value of your
rewards.
Invest In The Primary
Goal
The greatest award earning opportunity should link directly to the
primary goal of the program. This is a simple rule. Spend your
incentive dollars where your goal is. Allocate at least 60-75% of your
incentive budget to reward participants for achievement of the primary
objective. Too often well-meant programs are not well-spent in that
too much of the budget is spread thin to cover too many goals.
Motivate the Middle
Most companies live with the reality of the 80/20 rule that states
80% of revenue is generated by 20% of the sales force. This 20% is
typically entrepreneurial and extremely self-motivated. Incentive
programs for this group are effective, however, only marginally so.
Recognition and appeal to ego move this group more than incentives
(see next tip—Recognize Top Performers). Of the remaining 80%, 20% are
underachievers or lack the skills to make any serious sales impact.
Again, incentives will have minimal to no impact on this group. That
leaves the middle 60%. This is the group that successful incentive
programs target. They are more motivated by the opportunities of
success, specifically incentive rewards. This is the group that the
core program should be built around and to which the majority of
incentive dollars should be allocated.
Recognize Top
Performers
Top performers are a company’s bread-and-butter. It is important
to acknowledge their effort and their success. Allocate 5-10% of an
awards budget to promote top achievement and recognize top
performance. Friendly competition for top awards at this level will
service to motivate this ego driven audience.
Incentive Programs Are
Investments
How often are you asked, "What will this cost me?" As a result, we
get trapped into referring to the incentive program and its fixed cost
elements as costs. An incentive program is in fact an investment. You
should avoid language that refers to an incentive as a cost.
Performance
Improvement Programs Are Not Cure-Alls
This is a very important rule of thumb. An incentive program will
motivate a sales force to sell more, achieve personal goals or grow
your market share, provided that other factors related to the product
or sales environment are reasonable. An incentive program will not
compensate for a product that is not competitively priced. It will not
reverse declining product life cycle and it will not create customer
demand where it does not exist. If any of these factors exist, there
is a real and likely chance an incentive program will fail. Don’t be
afraid to challenge your clients’ belief that an incentive program
will solve their problems.
Manage Your Clients’
Expectations
This may seem obvious but it is a strategy that is often
overlooked. Obviously, don’t promise your client the moon and
stars—leave out the stars. Work with your customer to establish
benchmarks and measurements for success during all phases of the
incentive program’s life cycle.
Coming Soon...
THE DELUXE-LITE 2003-2004
EDITION
This popular point-based
catalog is currently being updated and will be available in late
January 2003. The newest version of the "Deluxe-Lite" will again
feature hundreds of brand name award selections with the majority of
items valued well below $500. This exceptional catalog may look and
feel "Lite," but the award selection is heavy. Hundreds of the most
popular selections will again be available as well as many new
high-demand products and impressive new brand names.
Again, another reason we
call it "Lite" is because it is, weighing in at considerably less than
the Deluxe Catalog, which translates into significant shipping
savings.
Once you see this new
version you’ll clearly see that in the case of Deluxe-Lite, less is
more!
|